The Undeserving Rights? A comparative study on Irregular Economic Migration between Thailand and Hungary
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| További közreműködők: | |
| Dokumentumtípus: | Diplomadolgozat |
| Kulcsszavak: | adatmigráció civil szervezetek emberi jogok helyi önkormányzati gazdálkodás migráció |
| Online Access: | http://dolgozattar.uni-bge.hu/45140 |
| Kivonat: | Severity of dire social and economic condition and now climate change have posed human lives at their occupational risks. Those lives in danger are forced to flee and seek out proper shelters, foods and jobs. Migration, in fact, is a long-existing trend in global arena, posed its signification on socio-economic and political aspects of many countries, specifically Thailand and Hungary. Because of that, the growing migration governance of both states have taken actions to impose order and regularity on complicate and dynamic migratory flows. However, the launched policy of governments is perceived as selective and ad-hoc treatment – which input a restriction of specific races – as well as they are standing on the disregard of humanitarianism. Distinguished from any other type of migration, irregular economic migration is oversight and recognize as an unneeded humanitarian assistance, “the undeserving”. They are treated as whose rights is undeserved, pushing through stigmatization, ethnicization and often seen as crime perpetrator or people who have taken advantage from the economy of the host country (ICMPD, 2020). This study portrays that despite Thailand and Hungary have not shared the similar politics of migration, background of society, culture, level of economy and religion, both stand on the similar fashions on migration and perpetrate common dilemmas. This comparison of the challenges and vulnerability of irregularly economic migration is to seek out the migration trends, function of states’ governance, disintegration of regional institutions – ASEAN and EU – and restriction on the presence of NGOs. With the use of exploratory approach, this research utilizes qualitative methodology, semi-structured interview and opinion survey to explain the irregular economic migration dilemmas between Thailand and Hungary. It is, in addition, further explained with theoretical frameworks, such as Lee’s model of push and pull, post-structuralism, Nativism and Neo-Marxism, etc., to show that both Hungary and Thailand are committed to highly protectionist approach toward irregular economic migrations, and this significantly formulates forms of violence and victimization in which taken from the migration’s mistreatment and racial injustice. |
|---|